<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Judgment on Worldwide Stew</title><link>https://worldwidestew.com/tags/judgment/</link><description>Recent content in Judgment on Worldwide Stew</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>worldwide@worldwidestew.com (Michael Davis)</managingEditor><webMaster>worldwide@worldwidestew.com (Michael Davis)</webMaster><copyright>© 2026 Worldwide Stew, aka Michael Davis.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://worldwidestew.com/tags/judgment/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Replay Versus Reality</title><link>https://worldwidestew.com/blog/2026-10-26-replay-versus-reality/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate><author>worldwide@worldwidestew.com (Michael Davis)</author><guid>https://worldwidestew.com/blog/2026-10-26-replay-versus-reality/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="when-referees-can-hit-rewind"&gt;When Referees Can Hit Rewind&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though I&amp;rsquo;ve never been much interested in sports, I recollect the early days of &lt;em&gt;instant replay&lt;/em&gt;. When a disputed play occurred, referees could review what happened and, sometimes, revise a call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Was there a foul? Did the basketball shot leave the air in time to be counted? Did the baseball player&amp;rsquo;s foot actually touch home plate?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of debating it in circles, instant replay offered something unprecedented: the option of seeing &lt;em&gt;what really happened&lt;/em&gt;. Sports teams felt certain that calls of all kinds could be fairly reviewed. Initial referee decisions could be changed. At last, we&amp;rsquo;d have proof about who was &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>